A straight answer, not a sales runaround. Every enquiry gets a reply within 24 hours — including the ones that turn out not to be a fit.
Author
Tonny
Date Published
Reading time
1 min
The honest filter for automation is boring: does this task repeat, and are the steps stable? Repetition without stability produces workflows that break constantly and cost more attention than the manual version ever did.
The second filter is what happens when it fails. An automation that silently stops is worse than no automation, because people stop checking the thing it replaced. Anything worth building is worth building with an error branch, a log, and somewhere for a failure to surface where a human will actually see it.
We design workflows to be idempotent for the same reason — running one twice should not produce two invoices, two emails, or two records. That property is easy to build in at the start and genuinely painful to retrofit once real data is flowing through.
The goal is never "automate everything". It is to remove the specific repeated steps that consume attention without needing judgement, and to leave the judgement where it belongs.
